Tag Archive | "constitution"

Tags: , , ,

How States Can Safeguard Against Meltdown of U.S. Economy

Posted on 23 April 2012 by Survivalist

When this country was conceived, the states were intended to retain sovereignty as free and independent nation states, which is why state’s rights are protected under the Constitution. These days, the 10th Amendment (as well as other amendments) doesn’t seem to be at all relevant to the federal government anymore, but it takes more than hollering for state’s rights to reclaim any true and sovereignty. States must develop their own infrastructures and systems, and most importantly, stop accepting the federal funding that keeps them beholden to Washington authority. States that do not take vital steps now to protect their independence and solvency will be much more vulnerable and hardest hit when the U.S. inevitably falls into economic collapse. The following is an interesting article that I came across by Brandon Smith from Prepper Podcast Radio News, detailing six steps that states should take to protect themselves from financial collapse:

The states of America are, truly, children of the Constitution. The legal framework that is the foundation of state sovereignty and internal administration is unique for perhaps any country in history up to the moment the U.S. won its independence. States were designed to decentralize and keep in check the power of a subservient Federal Government. They were meant to be the guardians at the gate, the barrier to the formation of oligarchy or outright dictatorship. This, of course, has changed drastically.

The battle over centralized verses decentralized authority and economy has been going on for quite some time, and is undeniably critical in our climate of crisis now, under a government which is bankrupt in every sense and a currency which is on the verge of calamity.

A vast shift in state independence was definitely caused by the reformations of the Civil War, but the progressive erasure of financial sovereignty in the states was really placed on the fast track after the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, when the enforcement of new taxes fueled the establishment machine, including social security (which the government constantly steals from) and the income tax (which does not pay for any state infrastructure), came to life. Now, the Federal Government could borrow fiat money created at will by the private central bank from thin air, and, it could tax the populace to feed the Federal Reserve in a cannibalistic circle of doom. This dynamic has grown our government to a size so massive that it is now forced to monetize its own debt just to survive.

Setting aside the inevitable collapse of the dollar and our economic system as we know it, a considerable goal has been achieved by centralists; with so much free money at the disposal of the Feds, they could wipe away the last vestiges of state sovereignty by simply BUYING state compliance. Through agencies like the EPA, FDA, ATF, etc, 10th Amendment checks and balances are trampled constantly without any regard for local laws or the will of the people, but really, state governments and citizens would be in a far better position to deny such agency intrusions if they didn’t gobble every dollar that D.C. waves in their faces like doggie treats. In our era of tenuous fiscal sop-gaps and imploding economies, the need for Americans, and especially states, to decouple from the Federal Government and the mainstream system is more important than ever.

The following is a step by step method that states could use to accomplish the task of insulation from financial crisis and federal control. Much of it hinges on a willingness by state governments to actually pursue independence, which might seem like a naïve dream to most of us. But, in the wake of a major breakdown, and the fall of the greenback, I believe many states will be seeking a way to weather the storm, if only out of a desire to survive, and this includes walking away from their ties to Washington:

Step 1: Stop Accepting Federal Funding

For states already drowning in debt, this is probably an incomprehensible idea (there is no financial escape for California or Illinois that I can see), but for those states which have some responsibility, and lower debt levels, federal funding is not necessary. Much of the money that the Federal Government collects comes through state cooperation. This money is then handed back to the states through various avenues with strings attached. The rest of the capital D.C. pumps into states is attained through printing; which carries the high price of dollar devaluation and the hidden tax of inflation. The fact is, states are not required by law (yet) to accept federal funds. As long as states do so anyway, they expose themselves to federal influence. As the dollar goes, so shall all those tied to it. States should take a lesson from the Asian bloc nations like China or Japan and begin distancing themselves as far away from U.S. currency and debt as possible. In the long term, those that do will endure. Those that don’t will be drug under the water along with the sinking ship.

Step 2: Enforce 10th Amendment Nullification

Once states are no longer beholden to federal monies, they have more leeway to obstruct intrusions by alphabet agencies and to deny dangerous legislative programs (like Obamacare) which put them at financial risk. Nullification takes many forms, and numerous issues have the potential to become vehicles for the assertion of 10th Amendment rights. One very fascinating political method was devised by representative Phil Hart of Idaho, who used the power to declare emergencies by states themselves to devise a piece of legislation which would allow Idaho to trump Federal and EPA restriction of the local wolf problem. As the bill flew through the legislature, interestingly, Congress delisted the wolf as an endangered species. Obviously, the Federal Government did not want the issue to become a success for 10th Amendment rights, and so defused the situation pulling the EPA back. Essentially, the Federal Government blinked.

 

This strategy could be used for multiple state conflicts with the Federal Government to effectively nullify their ability to lord over and interfere with specific needs of the people of a particular region. The future economic prosperity of the various states will depend greatly on their ability to take decisive fiscal action without constantly having to ask permission from the feds.

Step 3: Set Up A State Bank

There is certainly some controversy over the idea of a state bank. In the end, any institution can be twisted for devious ends, and a state bank is no different. However, this system has worked well in North Dakota, where a state bank has been in operation for over 90 years. Some from the “left” (whatever that means anymore) often attempt to use the institution as an example of “socialist banking”, which is not exactly accurate, and gives the strategy a bad name. Yes, the bank is state owned, but its purpose is to invest in and encourage free market enterprise within the state, not create a state owned and operated economy.

A state bank would be especially effective in resource rich areas, where a state government can invest in local projects run by local companies which employ local people. This is the opposite of what we see so often today, where international corporate entities are given monopoly over resource development within a state. They siphon away most of the profits and jobs from the region, while the Federal Government thwarts the growth of competing small businesses through concerted taxation and regulation. This goes on because states often do not feel they have the funding capability to encourage local business efforts. The problem diminishes drastically with a state bank, if done correctly, honestly, and with oversight from the citizenry.

Read More…

 

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Online NDAA Protest Campaign: Belligerent Act

Posted on 03 March 2012 by Survivalist


The non-profit group Belligerent Act (belligerentact.org) is spearheading an online protest demanding the repeal of certain sections of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012.  The act that was signed by Barack Obama on December 31st 2011 calling for indefinite military detention of those considered committing “belligerent acts” against the United States.

The specific provision of the act in question is Subtitle D — Counterterrorism SEC. 1021.  Language in section 1021 states that any “covered person” may be placed under indefinite military detention without trial.  This includes United States citizens.

This act is in direct violation of our Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights.  Those being protection against warrantless search and seizure, the guarantee of due process of law and the right to a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury, respectively.  

According to a spokesperson for Belligerent Act, “The website we put up at belligerentact.org has two goals. The first is to educate the American public in a straightforward way about how Section 1021 of the NDAA is abrogating their constitutional rights and why that is important. The second goal is to launch an online protest which we hope will go viral all over the web, forcing the US Government to respond.”

We feel that in drafting and signing the NDAA, the US Government has itself committed a belligerent act against the citizens of the United States. We are concerned that under the guise of ‘national security’ the government is laying the legal groundwork for using the military and the threat of indefinite military detention to put down popular protest (such as the various Occupy movements). And we believe that such a declaration of hostility towards American citizens must be met with an overwhelming popular protest and demand for the Act’s repeal.”

On the website we provide ‘Belligerent Act’ banners along with simple copy and paste html code that anyone with a blog or website can use to put the banner on their site, declaring their site a ‘Belligerent Act’, and linking their readers back to our educational page for detailed information about the NDAA and the protest campaign.”

Show your support of “Belligerent Act” and protest this heinous violation of our Constitutional rights!

More information about Belligerent Act, the NDAA, and the online protest can be found at belligerentact.org.

 

This Website is a Belligerent Act

 

 

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Bill Set to Clear the Way for 30,000 Surveillance Drones Over U.S.

Posted on 16 February 2012 by Survivalist

Can you smell the police state coming? Just when I think the attack on our rights and privacy couldn’t get any worse, another entirely unbelievable threat shows up on the horizon. The House and Senate have recently voted for the passage of a bill (H.R. 658) that will allow the use of surveillance drones to spy on American citizens. But hold on… it gets worse. In addition to surveillance cameras, these drones will reportedly be equipped with shotgun tasers, so they can shoot and disable you right where you stand before you even know what’s coming!

Since unmanned drones have already been proven so effective in the summary executions of American citizens who were suspected of having connections to crimes of terror (one of whom was a teenager), and since all American citizens are now considered “guilty until proven innocent” under NDAA, what’s to stop them from arming drones with rockets or machine guns? 

Rep. Ron Paul: 

“If the American people accept this blindly and casually, that we now have an accepted practice of the president assassinating people who he thinks are bad guys. I think it’s sad,” Paul told reporters after a speech in Manchester, New Hampshire. 

“Al-Awlaki was born here, he’s an American citizen, he was never tried or charged for any crimes,” Paul said. “To start assassinating American citizens without charges – we should think very seriously about this.” 

It might be easy to dismiss the concern of flying drones tasing or gunning down Americans in the streets as paranoid, knee-jerk alarmism, but it’s hard to tell what is these days. If someone had warned me about the Patriot Act or NDAA back in 2000, I would have thought those things could never happen in America either. And even if these drones are to be unarmed (which, I frankly doubt), just the fact that another layer is being added to the Big-Brother surveillance grid should be enough to cause great concern. 

American Civil Liberties Union: 

Unfortunately, nothing in the bill would address the very serious privacy issues raised by drone aircraft. This bill would push the nation willy-nilly toward an era of aerial surveillance without any steps to protect the traditional privacy that Americans have always enjoyed and expected.

And let us not forget general safety considerations. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has strict restrictions against domestic deployment of unmanned drones in U.S. air space for a good reason – the safety risk that comes with filling the sky with flying robots!

In case you don’t know, they tend to crash a lot more frequently than commercial aircraft.

Here’s the details about what the bill would do: 

  • Require the FAA to simplify and speed up the process by which it issues permission to government agencies to operate drones. It must do this within 90 days. The FAA has already been working on a set of proposed regulations to loosen the rules around drones, reportedly set for release in the spring of 2012.
  • Require the FAA to allow “a government public safety agency” to operate any drone weighing 4.4 pounds or less as long as certain conditions are met (within line of sight, during the day, below 400 feet in altitude, and only in safe categories of airspace).
  • Require the FAA to establish a pilot project within six months to create six test zones for integrating drones “into the national airspace system.”
  • Require the FAA to create a comprehensive plan “to safely accelerate the integration of civil unmanned aircraft systems into the national airspace system.” “Civil” drones means those operated by the private sector; currently it is all but impossible for any non-government entity, except for hobbyists, to get permission to fly drones (for-profit use of drones is banned). Industry groups and their congressional supporters see this as a potential area for growth. Congress specifies that the plan must provide for the integration of drones into the national airspace system “as soon as practicable, but not later than September 30, 2015.” The FAA has nine months to create the plan. The FAA is also required to create a “5-year roadmap for the introduction” of civil drones into the national airspace.
  • Require the FAA to publish a final rule within 18 months after the comprehensive plan is submitted, “that will allow” civil operation of small (under 55 pounds) drones in the national airspace, and a proposed rule for carrying out the comprehensive plan.

Here’s a list of the Senators who voted for this bill. See if your state’s legislators think the government should be allowed to spy on you from the sky. 

From www.Senate.gov 

Lamar Alexander (R-TN)
Kelly Ayotte (R-NH)
Max Baucus (D-MT)
Mark Begich (D-AK)
Michael Bennet (D-CO)
Jeff Bingaman (D-NM)
Roy Blunt (R-MO)
John Boozman (R-AR)
Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
Scott Brown (R-MA)
Richard Burr (R-NC)
Maria Cantwell (D-WA)
Tom Carper (D-DE)
Saxby Chambliss (R-GA)
Dan Coats (R-IN)
Tom Coburn (R-OK)
Thad Cochran (R-MS)
Susan Collins (R-ME)
Chris Coons (D-DE)
Bob Corker (R-TN)
John Cornyn (R-TX)
Dick Durbin (D-IL)
Mike Enzi (R-WY)
Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)
Lindsey Graham (R-SC)
Charles Grassley (R-IA)
Kay Hagan (D-NC)
Dean Heller (R-NV)
John Hoeven (R-ND)
Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX)
Jim Inhofe (R-OK)
Dan Inouye (D-HI)
Johnny Isakson (R-GA)
Mike Johanns (R-NE)
Tim Johnson (D-SD)
Ron Johnson (R-WI)
John Kerry (D-MA)
Herbert Kohl (D-WI)
Jon Kyl (R-AZ)
Mary Landrieu (D-LA)
Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Carl Levin (D-MI)
Joe Lieberman (ID-CT)
Dick Lugar (R-IN)
Joe Manchin (D-WV)
John McCain (R-AZ)
Mitch McConnell (R-KY)
Robert Menendez (D-NJ)
Jerry Moran (R-KS)
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Patty Murray (D-WA)
Bill Nelson (D-FL)
Ben Nelson (D-NE)
Rob Portman (R-OH)
Mark Pryor (D-AR)
John Reed (D-RI)
Harry Reid (D-NV)
Pat Roberts (R-KS)
Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)
Marco Rubio (R-FL)
Chuck Schumer (D-NY)
Jeff Sessions (R-AL)
Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
Richard Shelby (R-AL)
Olympia Snowe (R-ME)
Jon Tester (D-MT)
John Thune (R-SD)
Pat Toomey (R-PA)
Mark Udall (D-CO)
Tom Udall (D-NM)
Mark Warner (D-VA)
Jim Webb (D-VA)
Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI)
Roger Wicker (R-MS)
Ron Wyden (D-OR)

To read more, go to: http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/report-protecting-privacy-aerial-surveillance-recommendations-government-use 

http://pprnnews.prepperpodcast.com/bill-clears-path-for-30000-surveillance-drones-over-us-in-next-ten-years/#axzz1mTO4QrKI

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The American Dream

Posted on 31 January 2012 by Survivalist

Have you ever tried to explain to someone how our economy and fractional reserve banking work, only to be met with a blank, glazed stare? Or try to get them to understand that our fiat currency is based on nothing but debt, but they think you’re talking about a crappy Italian car that they owned back in the ’80s?

If they don’t understand that, they’ll never understand that the Federal Reserve is a privately owned bank, founded and maintained by an international cartel of criminal financiers and banksters, who’s sole purpose is enslave us with debt and inflation, while the IRS steals the rest.

For those who refuse to believe it, or don’t understand it, or are just too scared to listen, show them this video. Maybe then they’ll see why the economy is doomed to fail and why you’re getting prepared with food storage and survival gear.



Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Are We Witnessing the Roll-up to Martial Law in the U.S.?

Posted on 29 January 2012 by Survivalist

Is it just me, or does anyone else find it a little odd that Congress approved an additional $24M in funding to expand the TSA’s “VIPR” program, which operates checkpoints on highways, bus and train stations, sporting events and even at high school proms (!), right before NDAA was signed?

Congress is set to give the green light on funding for a massive expansion of TSA checkpoints, with the federal agency already responsible for over 9,000 such checkpoints in the last year amidst increased fears America is turning into a police state following the passage of the ‘indefinite detention’ bill.

Is it just a coincidence that FEMA is now seeking contractors to staff and supply even more of their “emergency camps” located all over the country?

Am I the only one who finds it disturbing that Special Ops forces have been conducting drills an maneuvers in Los Angeles, Miami and Boston over the last couple of days, using sports arenas as staging areas

This is becoming painfully clear due to the fact that the military trains for what they think they’re going to do.

If they are planning to fight in the desert, they would train in the desert and obviously if they are going to be fighting in a metropolitan setting in the United States, they would train in an American city.

Unfortunately, this is exactly what we are witnessing: increasing amount of training in urban American environments.

 

And now, reports are surfacing that the Military is training for martial law and urban warfare scenarios in a mock American city, roughly the size of downtown San Diego, outside of the Twenty nine Palms military base.

Call me paranoid, but none of this gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling inside. I may be nuts, but I don’t feel even one bit safer. In fact, it’s quite the opposite.

It’s becoming abundantly clear that the roll-out of all these “enhanced” security measures and military drills have nothing at all to do with protecting us from terrorists. The government continues to dump more and more money into these programs despite the fact that not one, NOT ONE terrorist threat has ever been foiled or even identified (unless you count the ones perpetrated by the FBI!). This has more to do with conditioning U.S. citizens to accept having their rights and civil liberties violated.

To those who think that all this effort and expense is being expended in the name of protecting you from the invisible hand of terrorism; you need to WAKE UP!  The government is not destroying the very things that make this country free because they’re afraid that a bunch of barefoot, cave-dwelling zealots might topple the strongest nation on Earth.

I just hope that enough of our servicemen and law enforcement officers remember that they took an oath, not to their commanding officers, or to Congress, or the president, but to the Constitution of the United States and the citizens who’s rights it protects.

 

Read More:

With all of the pieces in place, when will the hammer drop?

 

Why does the military seem to be preparing for urban warfare in the United States?

Militarized Drills Continue: Stadiums Prepped To Be Used As Martial Law Staging Centers

 

Comments (9)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

The Economy is Still Bush’s Fault and How do You Like Your New Police State?

Posted on 20 January 2012 by Survivalist

According to a poll that was recently published by the Washington Post and ABC television, nearly one in three Americans surveyed said they were not as well off as they were back in 2009, when Obama assumed the office of the presidency.

Now, I don’t typically put a lot of stock in polls, but you really don’t need this kind of social barometer in order to tell that things have gotten pretty rough. Well, for a third of us, I guess.

Fifteen percent of respondents in the Post-ABC poll said they were actually better off.”

Good for them… Maybe I should hang out with those people. Oh, wait a minute, they probably won’t allow me in their elite club…

…while 54 percent said they were in about the same shape.”

Maybe I should take what they’re taking… (Sshhh… Just take this pill… Everything’s fine.).

What’s even more disturbing is that a majority of the poll participants are still buying the “Obama inherited the recession, so it’s not really his fault” rhetoric.

Fifty-four percent of respondents said the Republican former president was more to blame for America’s economic travails…The poll also found that among the all-important independent bloc of voters, Bush garners an even greater share of the blame for the stalled economy: 57 percent to 25 percent for Obama.”

C’mon people. I thought we put this excuse to bed. While it’s true that Bush took a big steaming duke on the economy before he ran out of the office, Barry’s just mashing it into the fibers and calling it an improvement! How long do you think you’d keep your job if you kept losing more and more of your company’s money, and kept blaming the guy who had the job before you… three years ago…

If people are oblivious to that, then they’re certainly oblivious to the fact that Obama has absolutely no interest in any kind of meaningful economic recovery. Why? Because he’s been bought and paid for by the globalist corporations and foreign bankers who own this county, just like every other president in recent history.

What’s even more frightening than that is; he has come right out and basically declared war on the American people, with the signing of the NDAA and a slew of other draconian executive orders leading up to it.

Obama now has executive authority over our rural lands and our food supply, thanks to his compliance with the United Nation’s globalist Agenda 21 protocols. He’s gradually destroying our Second Amendment rights. He’s almost completely destroyed our Fourth Amendment rights – through the TSA, DHS and the renewal of the Patriot Act. And as a final coup de gras, he’s suspended Habius Corpus and laid the groundwork for a fascist police state, in which the military can function as law enforcement and every American is considered guilty until proven innocent… Oh wait a minute, how can that happen without a trial?? Not that you can prove a negative, anyway… Might as well kiss your Fifth Amendment rights goodbye too.

But don’t worry…  If you’re not doing anything wrong, then you’ve got nothing to worry about, right?? (just ask the Germans, Russians, Cambodians, etc… They’ll tell you).  Now let’s get back to blaming Bush for the economy!

 


Comments (1)


Survival & Preparedness News


Product Reviews, Featured Articles, Community Events, Videos & more. Everything to keep you in the know!

Advertise Here


Issue #1 REPRINT Offer!

Get the issue that started it all! We have REPRINTED a short run of the Premier Issue of Survivalist. Order your copy now! This limited time offer will not last long... Details >>

Issue #1 will not be printed again in a single issue format.

Kindle Owner? Get It Now on Kindle!


Get Survivalist on Kindle

View Survival Guides

Advertise Here

Survivalist Magazine Free Trial

Survivalist Magazine